Wannabe TV Chef

My journey to pseudo-stardom.

Mario Batali, the King of Spain and the F-bomb

Much has been made of cheflebrity Mario Batali’s use of the f-word at a $1,000-a-plate dinner during the South Beach Wine & Food Festival last week.  Apparently while introducing fellow cheflebrity Jose Andres, Batali spoke the forbidden word and did so within feet of honored guests King Juan Carlos and Queen Sofia of Spain.  For good measure he then grabbed Andres’ bum.

What I cannot understand is why is this news?  A chef dropped the f-bomb?  Really?  Someone in the restaurant industry used profanity?  That is an issue?

NEWSFLASH: People in the food service industry cuss . . . a lot.

Why?  Because no word in history has ever hurt anyone.  We in the culinary arts are just more enlightened than those in other professions.

Perhaps it isn’t what he said that has those in the media in a tizzy?  It could be where he said it but again that argument lacks buoyancy as well.  It was spoken in a crowd of chefs and restaurant types.  It’s likely they didn’t even notice.

So it must be that he said it in front of visiting leaders from a forgein country.  Except that, like England, Spain’s monarchy is mostly ornamental.  Also these dignataries were from Spain a country that has actually surpassed France and Italy as the place to go for a great restaurant.  I bet Ferran Adrià wouldn’t bat an eye if the f-word were uttered in the legendary kitchen of El Bulli.

So to close this issue let me say that Mario Batali used the f-word, big wup.

February 27, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food News, Food on Film | , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Emerilware Thwarts Home Invasion

Found this posted by Joe Crea/Plain Dealer Food and Restaurants Editor and thought you’d like it:
Emeril replaces pan used in attack

70-year-old woman used pan against teen attackers

ELYRIA, Ohio (AP) – Chef Emeril Lagasse says he felt so bad when he heard a woman lost one of his trademark pans while warding off home intruders that he’s replacing the item.

Lagasse is sending 70-year-old Ellen Basinski a whole new set of his signature cookware.

She used her favorite pan to fight the intruders at her home west of Cleveland on Tuesday. Police then took it from her to be used as evidence.

Basinski was on the phone with her husband when the teens pushed their way into her home.

Her husband, Lorain County Judge David Basinski, overheard the scuffle, called 911 and raced home. Meanwhile, his wife says she grabbed the 5-quart saucepan and hit one teen, who was going through her purse.

The four were arrested. The judge said his wife was upset that her pan was seized by police.

February 27, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food News | , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Food Network Challenge

Like many FN fans, I catch a handful of episodes each week of Food Network Challenge and I usually lament, “Remember when they used to cook?” Cake decorating is neat, now and then. But anything past an episode of Ace of Cakes and I start to get bored. After all, most of those flamboyant cakes taste like talcum powder and axle grease.

I’m not saying that cake decorating or sugar sculpting aren’t interesting.  I am saying they aren’t interesting day in and day out.  When I watch FNC, I want to see someone cooking.  I want to watch the creativity of my peers and marvel at how their minds work.  I want to be inspired.

It was during one of these mental rants that it dawned on me.  The current format is driven by the market.  Viewers want to see more UFO cakes and chocolate dinosauers.  Food Network is only showing so many dessert compititions because that’s what people want to see.

I like the five tastes (all six of them)  not just sweet.  Cakes taste sweet, chocolate tastes sweet and sugar sculptures damned sure taste sweet.  It appears that I am a food snob.  Oh well, I still have ICA and Chopped to inspire me.

February 26, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food and Cooking, Food on Film | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Shrimp: The Truth

The following is an article written by Jim Carrier for Orion Magazine.  If you love shrimp it is important that you take the time to read this article.  Thanks to Mark Bittman for bringing it to my attention.  Now, read and learn:

The green dumpster behind Red Lobster was nearly empty when I lifted the lid. Through the effluvium of yesterday’s supper, way down, sat a couple of pretty blue boxes. I hitched myself over the rim, leaned in, and took one.

I am not a regular dumpster diver. I was driven by a hunger for knowledge. Inside the restaurant, where the décor, ambience, soundtrack—all but the smell—reeked of the sea, I asked the server who laid before me the first plate of Red Lobster’s “endless shrimp” where they came from.

“Farms,” she said.

“Where are these farms?” I asked.

“Different places.” She gave a shrug. “Do you want another beer?”

I ate only eight grilled shrimp from Red Lobster’s “endless” supply. Something was stuck in my craw. An hour before, I had been in a community hall in Brownsville, Texas, with forty-three angry, tearful American shrimpers. In a country awash in shrimp, they were going bankrupt. They had gathered to hear more bad news: severe new rules limiting what they could catch.

“What about Red Lobster?” I asked the group.

“Red Lobster!” one man shouted. “They’re our enemy. They haven’t bought a shrimp since the 1980s.”

The restaurant walls were covered with shrimp boats—striking photos of trawlers at docks, at sea, in sunset silhouettes. The Gulf of Mexico was a mile away. Yet, while I sat eating, real shrimp boats sat rusting, their outriggers raised as if surrendering.

The box from the dumpster gave me a clue: “Product of Ecuador. Farm Raised.”

I am farm raised. I nurse a nostalgia for what those words used to mean. Holding that fetid box, I began to question my own clueless consumption. From a springboard both pure and naïve, I dove into all-you-can-eat shrimp.

SHRIMP, IN MY YOUTH in upstate New York, were rare and pricey. I remember a 1960s shrimp cocktail at the Rainbow Room atop Rockefeller Center. I don’t remember my date’s face but I do recall a scent of privilege. Thirty years would pass before another shrimp scene would be as sharply etched on my mind. It was late October in the Carolinas. I had tied my sailboat to an old wood dock in front of a village on the Intracoastal Waterway. Around me marsh grass tinted gold by the sunset was slowly emerging from ebbing waters. Barely a month into living aboard, I’d opened a beer to toast my good fortune when a man from the village walked onto the dock with a bucket and ball of netting.

With a practiced arabesque he threw the net. It blossomed into a ten-foot parachute that dappled a circle and sank. In a few seconds, he pulled the line and wet flopping creatures spilled onto the dock. He sorted through them, discarded several, and repeated the motion. Half a dozen throws later the bucket held two handfuls of shrimp.

“Supper,” he said, and walked off.

The scene was magical, almost biblical: its grace and bounty, its sense of proportion—one man, one meal—evoked a sustaining ocean. As I sailed farther south I began to see shrimp everywhere. Shrimp boats seining night and day. Roadside stands selling shrimp from coolers. All-you-can-eat shrimp buffets for a few dollars. These waters, a federal survey reported in 1884, contained “immense schools” of shrimp, so many a man could catch bushels on a “pleasant evening.” It appeared that nothing had changed. In fact, everything had changed during a century in which shrimp had gone from lowly regional fare, caught by hand, to America’s favorite seafood.

In 1913, one hundred miles down the coast from where I had watched the man cast his net, Billy Corkum, a Massachusetts fishing captain, introduced the otter trawl to Amelia Island, Florida. An ungainly contraption of ropes, cables, wooden doors and nets, the trawl was dragged through the water just above the ocean floor, its mouth open like a whale’s. Modified with a drooping chain to “tickle” mud-dwelling shrimp into jumping into the maw, diesel-pulled trawls scooped shrimp by the billions.

“We never had so darned many shrimp,” old-timer Anthony Taranto told the Southern Foodways Alliance, a University of Mississippi institute that studies southern food culture. “You couldn’t hardly sell them and couldn’t hardly do nothing with them.”

Shrimp are a perfect protein delivery system, built with a head and carapace that twist off easily, revealing a muscle that can be cooked in three minutes. The Chinese and Greeks loved them. Apicius included shrimp in his Roman cookbook. But it took decades for shrimp to whet appetites outside the American South. Packed in barrels of ice and shipped by rail, shrimp were served in tulip glasses as “cocktails” in upstate New York in 1914. As cookbooks added Low Country recipes, canning and, in 1943, a shrimp-peeling machine—invented by teenager J.M. Lapeyre in Houma, Louisiana, who noticed how easily shrimp meat could be squished out of its shell by his rubber boot—made shrimp available nationwide.

Trawls soon emptied the shallows of southern waters and moved deeper. For seventy years growing fleets of bigger boats galloped from one gold strike to another as veins of shrimp were discovered off Louisiana (white, 1933), Mexico (brown, 1940), Dry Tortugas (pink, 1949), and Key West, where in 1957 huge, royal red shrimp were discovered a thousand feet down.

“Greater riches are being brought up than all the gold ever sunk off the Spanish Main,” gushed National Geographic in 1957. Many shrimpers became millionaires.

“We were outlaws,” Wallace Beaudreaux, of Brownsville, Texas, eighty-one, told me, describing raids into Mexican waters. It was not unusual for boats to gross $10,000 to $25,000 on a single trip.

I felt rich, in 1998, buying a pound of shrimp for a mere three dollars right off the boats near where I anchored in Key West. I had only one question: with thousands of boats endlessly trawling and millions like me endlessly gobbling, how could there be any shrimp left in the sea?

“Shrimp are a crop, like wheat,” shrimpers replied. “You can’t overfish them.”

I was asking the wrong question. I should have wondered where all these shrimp were coming from, and how they could cost three dollars a pound. I happened to sail into the Deep South in time to witness the crash of a culture bound to, and blinded by, endless shrimp dreams.

SHRIMP HAVE BEEN AROUND since Gondwana. Their tracks are found alongside dinosaurs’, which explains their astounding diversity—more than two thousand species in every body of water in the world. They are a major food source for Salt Lake gulls, ocean whales, Gulf red snapper—virtually every marine critter, which makes them ideal bait.

But the shrimp’s life cycle was understood only in the 1960s. Shrimp didn’t ascend rivers to spawn, as once thought, but reversed the process in a complicated and delicate cycle. Adult shrimp mate in deep water, holding each other feet-to-feet. He inserts a capsule of sperm and she spews half a million microscopic eggs that resemble milk spilled in water. These babies molt through a dozen tiny, spiderlike creatures, finally emerging shrimplike in a month.

With mysterious instinct they move up and down in the water column, catching waves, currents, and winds that sweep them into shallow bays. In the Gulf this cycle coincides with a shift from northerly to southerly winds, a warming of bay waters, and an increase in freshwater runoff from rivers, which reduces salinity. In these brackish, rich estuaries, protected by reeds and organic muck, they begin devouring one-celled algae called diatoms and growing at the rate of one inch a month. In two or three months, triggered apparently by increased salinity, they begin to walk—literally—and flick their tails back to the sea, traveling as far as two hundred miles. Left alone, a shrimp grows to a length of six to eight inches, developing a tail as big around as a man’s thumb. At this stage they are in deep water, ready to spawn before dying or being eaten by a predator.

I learned all this aboard Leslie Hartman’s runabout one May day in Mobile Bay. She was out there, as she is every week of the year, her long brown ponytail swinging like a pendulum as she heaved a miniature trawl off the stern. As Alabama’s shrimp biologist, Hartman’s job is to constantly sample the size of shrimp returning to the sea, and determine when they are large enough to open the state’s shrimp season.

After fifteen minutes, she stopped the boat, hauled in the net, and dumped the catch into a white bucket. She knelt and fingered through glistening life. Little rays, horned blowfish, baby snapper, and a bunch of crabs were thrown back. Left in the bottom were a set of creatures that ranged from transparent globules half an inch long to juvenile shrimp up to two inches. She counted, measured, and logged the sample and sped off for another drag elsewhere.

The threshold for legal shrimp in Alabama is 68 shrimp per pound. A “68” shrimp is pretty small, often canned, tossed into macaroni salad, or breaded and fried as “popcorn” shrimp. Shrimp cocktails use a minimum size of 40 to 50 per pound. When I look at shrimp in a grocer’s case I usually choose “20–25,” the size of my little finger. Hartman’s task was to calculate when the average of her samples reached 68. She was always anxious to reach that point, for she considered herself a friend of the industry.

“We want our great-grandchildren to be shrimpers a hundred and fifty years from now,” she said.

“GO,” SHOUTED JOE SKINNER, releasing brakes that governed two winches. Squeals, grinds, the sounds of cable and rope under stress on the throbbing bed of a major diesel smothered the splash of green nets on the water. As cables let out, the nets disappeared behind the boat. At 6 a.m. at the start of the 2005 Alabama shrimp season, the A.S. Skinner was trawling.

We were in Mobile Bay. A rising sun, barely burning through haze, added a band of pink to a formless horizon. Around us a circus of boats—trawls, skiffs, outboards—were out for opening day. “It’s a madhouse,” said Mike Skinner, Joe’s brother, at the helm. A black radar screen set at one-mile resolution was dotted with forty or fifty green moving spots. “I’ll be glad when this day is over.”

A.S. Skinner, for whom the boat was named, had been a jeweler, as was his son. But grandson Gary left gold in the showcase to seek his fortune with shrimp. Great-grandsons Mike and Joe joined him at age five. By high school, the last formal education they sought, they were taking boats out by themselves. “When I came out of high school, we done good,” said Mike, tall and angular, dressed in blue-jean shorts and a white t-shirt. The first year they grossed $200,000. “We didn’t work that hard. Dad had two good years and then it started dropping.”

The Skinners, aged thirty-two and thirty, each with a one-year-old son, reminded me of cowboys I’d known out West, still pining for pastures before barbed wire. Their dreams of a commons, free to exploit, had once been our dream, so woven into our national DNA that we, like they, mourned its passing. Each spring they rode out after a myth, only to find the world had changed.

The sea stopped giving in the 1980s. Catches flattened worldwide. There were, in fact, only so many shrimp in the sea. And because of overfishing for half a century, the average shrimp size caught in the Gulf had shrunk from “50” to “75.”

There was also growing dismay that shrimpers wasted more than they caught. Down below, in the channel made famous by Union Admiral Farragut’s cry, “Damn the torpedoes. Full speed ahead,” was a kind of “fishing” that was nothing short of marine clearcutting.

In the gold-rush days, before Joe and Mike were born, shrimpers killed ten pounds of sea life for every pound of harvested shrimp—waste that reached one billion pounds a year in the Gulf. Once called “trash,” now called “by-catch,” this sea life included sea turtles driven to the brink of extinction, and juvenile red snapper, a good eating fish. Under environmental regulations requiring escape hatches in nets, the by-catch-to-shrimp ratio has been reduced to four-to-one, still a startling sight when the Skinners dumped their twin nets on deck. Using grain shovels, they transferred this squirming pile into a large wooden box of seawater mixed with Cargil Boat and Boil salt. The shrimp sank to the bottom, and the by-catch, mostly dead, floated to the surface. This they skimmed and threw overboard.

Gulf shrimpers, the last cowboys of the sea, were corralled in 2006 when the U.S. government, trying to balance the Gulf’s ecosystem with a sustainable supply of shrimp for a viable commercial fishery, capped the federal-waters shrimp fleet at twenty-seven hundred boats, down from a gold-rush high of seventy-five hundred, and ordered federal clerks to be randomly stationed aboard to record by-catch. The goal was a “maximum sustainable yield,” roughly 110 million pounds a year, which left 22 billion shrimp to reproduce, according to modeling by Dr. Jim Nance, head of the NOAA Fisheries Service Galveston Laboratory. This figure was half the natural shrimp population before the arrival of the trawl, estimated Bill Hogarth, the former head of the agency.

The Skinners grossed $1,000 on opening day—not a bad haul, I thought, until I learned that it was half the price they got when they were teenagers. They made a living but not a killing selling their shrimp to their father, who ran a roadside stand on Dauphin Island. “The last few years, we’re just paying for fuel,” said Joe, sitting below their federal license framed on the Masonite wall of their boat’s dinette. “If it weren’t for the shop . . .” His voice trailed off.

What really ended the Skinners’ dreams, what really brought shrimpers to their knees and tears in Mobile Bay, Brownsville, New Orleans, Biloxi, and Bayou la Batre—all along the Gulf Coast—was not regulation or lack of shrimp but good old global supply and demand. “Because of imported, farmed shrimp from the Far East,” said Joe Skinner, “wholesale shrimp prices in the U.S. are the same as when Dad started thirty years ago.”

THE STORY OF FARMED SHRIMP begins with a Japanese dish called “dancing shrimp,” a casserole that arrives at your table with the unmistakable sound of something inside striking the cover. Jumping about on a bed of hot rice are Kuruma prawns—live. The object is to grab one between chopsticks and pop it wiggling into your mouth. Kuruma, large, meaty shrimp found in limited quantities in the Sea of Japan, sell for a hundred dollars a pound. Seventy-five years ago this rarity prompted an ichthyology student at Tokyo University to try growing Kuruma in captivity.

Until 1933, when Motosaku Fujinaga first spawned and hatched shrimp in a lab, aquaculture had been an ancient artisanal practice. Tides swept fish and shrimp into estuaries, and weirs were built to prevent their escape. The shrimp grew to eating size in naturally replenished waters.

Out of their element, though, shrimp proved to be finicky eaters, fragile and prone to diseases. It took Fujinaga twenty-five years of trying, interrupted by World War II, to be able to grow ten kilograms of shrimp to adulthood. In 1967, when he spoke to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s first world conference on shrimp culture in Mexico City, Fujinaga envisioned a world where capitalism and altruism could coexist in the “vast and boundless marshes, swamps, or jungles in the tropics.” Shrimp farms, he predicted, “will greatly contribute toward the increased supply of animal protein to the human race.”

It was a lovely thought. A Blue Revolution. But his success fueled a global grab in which protein and profits flowed one way—north toward the moneyed. One year after his speech, a group of Japanese businessmen bought Fujinaga’s technology, won a U.S. patent, and approached DuPont for money. DuPont declined, but two officials who heard the pitch, Paul Bente and John Rutledge Cheshire, were so excited they quit their jobs, put up $200,000 of Cheshire’s family money, and opened Marifarms in a bay near Panama City, Florida.

Aided by research at the U.S. lab in Galveston, Marifarms harvested a disappointing six thousand pounds in 1970, according to Cheshire’s book,Memoir of a Shrimp Farmer. The same year, another venture, Sea Farms, was digging canals in a Florida key to grow shrimp.

Because of environmental issues—Marifarms scooped up pregnant white shrimp and confined them in a public bay, while Sea Farms flew in nonindigenous shrimp from Central America, a practice Florida soon prohibited—shrimp farming moved south. Supported by USAID, World Bank loans, and willing developing-world officials, corporate giants United Fruit, Armour, Conagra, and Ralston Purina launched shrimp farms in Honduras, Brazil, Panama, and Ecuador, according to oral histories collected by Bob Rosenberry of Shrimp News International. Learning as they went, the farmed-shrimp industry laid waste to mangroves, fishing communities, and ecosystems. The word “plundering” comes to mind.

A shrimp farm is a saltwater feedlot. There can be as many as 170,000 shrimp larvae in a 1-acre pond that is 1 to 2 meters deep. So-called intensive ponds can yield 6,000 to 18,000 pounds of shrimp in that acre in 3 to 6 months. (A good wheat yield is 3,600 pounds per acre.) Because of this density, the waste they swim in, and their susceptibility to disease, most farmed shrimp are treated with antibiotics, only some of them legal in the U.S. A wide array of poisons is used to kill unwanted sea life and cleanse ponds for reuse, creating what Public Citizen calls a “chemical cocktail.” In random sampling of imported shrimp, health officials in the U.S., Japan, and the European Union have found chloramphenicol, a dangerous antibiotic banned in food.

The industry acknowledges that 5 percent of the world’s mangroves, hundreds of thousands of acres, have been destroyed creating shrimp ponds. In some estuaries 80 percent of the mangroves are gone. A commons was privatized, ruining artisanal fishing and driving indigenous fishermen to work raising shrimp. By removing the thick coastal barrier of trees, shrimp farms have undoubtedly aggravated damage from hurricanes and tsunamis. And salt intrusion has sterilized once-fertile estuaries.

Even in the best-run farms, two to four pounds of sea life is caught and ground up as feed for every pound of shrimp raised. Mortality rates of 30 percent are common. The dead shrimp, shrimp excrement, and chemical additives are often flushed into coastal waters.

By the mid 1970s, farmed shrimp from South and Central America, at less than half the cost of Gulf shrimp, began arriving at Red Lobster restaurants—and everywhere else. All-you-can-eat shrimp dinners became a standard, filling both waistlines and Red Lobster’s coffers. That box of shrimp I retrieved from the dumpster cost $2.50 a pound, and sold, in my case, for $25 a pound, a markup that bettered the beer’s.

Quietly, farmed shrimp took over the market, its source hidden behind the motif of a picturesque but actually sinking shrimp fleet. By 1980, half of America’s shrimp consumption came from foreign farms. By 2001, shrimp passed canned tuna as America’s favorite seafood. Today, 90 percent of our shrimp—more than 1 billion pounds a year—come from foreign farms. Virtually any restaurant chain, from Captain D’s to Red Lobster, serves farmed shrimp. Foreign farmed shrimp was peddled for years by vendors at the National Shrimp Festival in Alabama—until they were caught—and at happy hour for the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council meeting in Birmingham, Alabama, in March 2005, where government officials finalized a ten-year freeze on twenty-seven hundred shrimp boat licenses. The sight of government biologists slurping Vietnamese shrimp after reining in American shrimpers was an irony sharper than cocktail sauce. Even in New Orleans, where a handful of high-end chefs brag about their Louisiana shrimp, imported shrimp are the norm in most restaurants. A new Louisiana law requires restaurateurs to tell the truth—if asked.

TO GET A SENSE of the pink tsunami on U.S. shores, I flew to Long Beach, California, the single largest shrimp port, where among the five million containers arriving each year are several thousand filled with shrimp, 265 million pounds of it in a year.

On the day I visited, 5 ships were docking with 9 containers—412,000 pounds—of shrimp from Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela, and China. One container, a semitractor load, holds an astounding amount. Laid out in a customs warehouse, boxes holding 30,000 pounds of shrimp covered a 12-by-100-foot area chest high. Based on our average consumption, this one container held a year’s supply of shrimp for 12,000 Americans.

The container in question had been seized and opened because of suspicions that the beautiful bags of store-ready “26/30” frozen raw shrimp, labeled “farm raised in Indonesia,” may, in fact, have come from China and been relabeled in Singapore, a common cat-and-mouse game that customs officials calls “transshipment.” A bag was dispatched to a government lab in Savannah, Georgia, to try a new sniffing tool that might determine its source. Transshipping is used to evade special import taxes or restrictions, such as one imposed on Chinese shrimp and four other species in 2007 after malachite green, gentian violet, and other carcinogens were found in farmed fish.

“It’s very, very difficult to prove a transshipment issue,” said Jeff DeHaven, the deputy director of fines, penalties, and forfeitures. So great is their volume of business that importers just walk away from seized containers, he said. Moreover, U.S. customs is concerned primarily with duty issues, not food safety. “We don’t look at that much shrimp,” admitted an enforcement chief.

The Food and Drug Administration, responsible for imported food safety, samples less than 1 percent of the 1 billion pounds, a “sorry” record, according to U.S. Representative John Dingell, who in 2007 chaired food safety hearings before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Mindful of consumer fears fanned by poisoned seafood arriving from China, the Global Aquaculture Alliance—an industry group underwritten by Wal-Mart, Red Lobster, and multinational seafood importers—has written standards that, if enforced, could produce clean, safe shrimp without damaging people or the environment. But that will take years, admitted GAA president George Chamberlain. Only 45 shrimp farms are certified by the alliance—out of more than 100,000 worldwide.

TODAY, IF YOU LIVE more than a hundred miles from the Gulf Coast, the shrimp you eat most likely come from a foreign farm. You can tour these farms while standing at your supermarket seafood freezer and reading labels. The top ten importing countries are Thailand, Indonesia, Ecuador, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Mexico, India, Bangladesh, and Guyana. The wholesale value of their shrimp is $4 billion a year.

Despite that income, citizens in the developing world have protested shrimp farms—and been killed for doing so. The Blues of a Revolution, a book published in 2003 by a consortium of environmental and indigenous groups, described Honduran shrimp farms ringed by barbed wire and watchtowers and armed guards. Between 1992 and 1998, in the Bay of Fonseca near large shrimp farms, “11 fishermen have been found dead by shooting or by machete injuries . . . no one has been brought to justice.”

One story from the book I cannot shake involved Korunamoyee Sardar, a Bangladeshi woman who, on November 7, 1990, joined a protest against a new shrimp farm near Harin Khola. She was shot in the head, cut into pieces, and thrown into a Bangladesh river. A monument stands where she was murdered. It reads: “Life is struggle, struggle is life.”

Red Lobster, which buys 5 percent of the world’s shrimp, is Bangladesh’s biggest U.S. customer. The restaurant did not respond to repeated requests for an interview. 

 

I have been working on an article that includes some of the same subject matter and I can tell you that this situation is real.  The need for change is dire and literally a matter of life and death.  Whose life?  Yours.

February 25, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food and Cooking | , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

2009 Food Trends

Originally published at Paper Palate on February 23, 2009.

We are nearly one-sixth of the way through 2009 so now is a good time to examine some of the emerging trends in the culinary world.  As a reference I will use two publications geared towards opposite ends of the table, so to speak.

Gourmet is aimed at the consumer.  Acting sort of as a liaison between those preparing the meals and those consuming them, Gourmet is one of the heavy hitters in the publishing world.  Conversely, Cooking for Profit is a trade magazine published by the Gas Foodservice Equipment Network and is intended solely for the restaurant industry.

In their 2009 food & travel predictions, Gourmet suggests that amuse-bouche (complimentary hors d’œuvres) will increase in popularity.  The report cites one chef in particular, Doug Keane of Cyrus in Heldsburg, CA who gives up to a half dozen tasty morsels to his guests.  Also among their prognostications is a growing interest in yogurts from ruminants other than cows and with it will come a boon in small artisan yogurt brands.

For their part the folks at Cooking for Profit forecast an uptrend in the use of single-bite desserts.  The more that non-foodies learn about the overall benefits of locally sourced produce and sustainable seafood the more they will demand it from their favorite eatery so both are also en vogue.

Both publications are in accord that American parents are finally thinking about their children’s wellbeing by requesting healthy kid’s meals.  According to Cooking for Profit nutritional children’s dishes are one of the top five trends in the restaurant industry this year.  At the same time Gourmet reports that school districts around the nation are reducing the amount of fats (especially trans fats), sodium and sugar in their cafeterias.

However, the two publications take opposing stances on the consumer’s desire for original and complex cocktails.  Gourmet expects a “mixology backlash” after years of quirky Martinis and molecular concoctions.  They believe the consumer is ready for a simple adult beverage.  On the otherhand, Cooking for Profit is predicting that signature cocktails will be the alcohol trends of the year.  But both seem to think the furture looks good for micro-distillers.

Another point that both magazines feel will dominate the 2009 restaurant scene is the economy, or lack there of.  Both agree that restaurants large and small will be offering discounts, incentives and gimics to get people in the door.  That is great news for the customer that can muster the cash to go out.

February 24, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | From My Other Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

JEFF CORWIN DEVOURS ‘EXTREME CUISINE’ ON FOOD NETWORK

New Primetime Special Premieres February 21st at 9pm ET/PT
Corwin Journeys Through Thailand on a Fun-Filled Culinary Quest

NEW YORK – February 9, 2009 – Renowned for his expertise in wildlife and conservation, Jeff Corwin now sets his sights on exploring human culture through regional cuisine in his first Food Network endeavor: Extreme Cuisine with Jeff Corwin. With an open mind (and mouth), this thrilling primetime special follows the passionate foodie and anthropologist as he tears through Thailand on a radical culinary adventure. Premiering Saturday, February 21st at 9pm ET/PT, Jeff enjoys countless surprises and unforgettable flavors as he interacts with natives and showcases how exotic foods and customs uniquely shape each community – all in a day’s work!

The adventures begin as Jeff hikes northwest to the remote mountain region of Mae Hong Son to sample local delicacies like deadly wasp and bamboo larvae straight from the groves. In the nearby Pai River, Jeff and his guide use traditional bamboo materials to catch and cook catfish mixed with forest-grown greens and spices. Next, Jeff veers off the beaten path in Bangkok for an extraordinary feast including silk worms, grasshoppers, and live shrimp that literally “dance” into his mouth. In the southern Trang Province, Jeff helps prepare Moo Yaang Trang, the region’s famous roasted pig cooked in underground ovens. Then, in the Muslim fishing village of Palian, Jeff learns the extensive production process of fish sauce and trudges through coastline mud to harvest and eat the area’s surprising treat: fresh blood cockles. Loy Krathong (The Festival of Lights) and delicious street food wrap up Jeff’s entertaining culinary quest through Thailand.

For more information and photos from Jeff’s trip, visit: www.foodnetwork.com

February 21, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food on Film | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sous Chef 2 Go: “Recipe in a bag” Organic Ingredients in Every Bag

Miami, FL (MMD Newswire) February 12, 2009 — Introducing a new concept: “Sous Chef 2 Go”. It is a service featuring “A Recipe in a Bag”, designed to empower everyone in the kitchen. We offer a menu with dozens of traditional, unique, cultural, and health-conscious recipes that provide our customers with lots of flexibility in what they want to cook.

Meals are thoughtfully prepped in portions for two, four or six people and priced, accordingly. You can order your choice(s) each day or choose from the two featured “Bags of the Day”.

Almost all ingredients are Certified Organic, including spices. Fresh seafood recipes are available on Fridays, depending on what fresh fish available. Also, if you have a special recipe you’ve been eager to try, but have not made the time to shop for the ingredients -simply email, fax or phone it in to us – and within a few hours you will have all the ingredients, freshly prepared and ready-to-go.  All you literally have to do is “cook it”.

Recipes are categorized as follows:
Healthy Living (Low calories, good carbs and low fat)
In a Hurry (Less than an hour to cook)
Passport (Global cuisine)
What’s the Rush? (Longer cooking times)
“Wow” a Crowd (Gourmet all the way, plus Holiday feasts)
Vegetarian (No animal products; meatless diets)
On The Grill (Barbeque). Coming soon!

At Sous Chef 2 Go we are environment-conscious and package our recipes in biodegradable materials. We also offer overnight shipping, delivery within our immediate area, surgical stainless steel cookware for sale or rent, boutique wines, gift certificates and more.  Please visit their webpage at www.souschef2go.com for more information.

February 20, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food News | , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Forget the Fat, Bacon Salt Rules!

Origianlly blogged right here on July 20, 2008 – update follows.

I have been checking out a new innovation called bacon salt.  It is the invention of Justin and Dave, Bacontrepreneurs.  And they claim it makes everything taste like bacon.  Here’s what they have to say about it:

We’re Justin and Dave, the two guys behind Bacon Salt™ and this is our improbable bacon-flavored story. Who are we? We’re just two regular guys who love grilling and football on Sunday afternoons, eating until we can’t get off the couch and of course, the taste of great bacon. And it’s our dream to make everything taste like bacon.

Up until several months ago, we worked together in a little technology company. While on a business trip together, we had the chance to sit down for dinner and eventually, the conversation turned to our mutual love of bacon. It was then that Justin told Dave and another coworker named Kara about his idea for Bacon Salt™. Kara, who is a vegetarian, loved the idea. Dave, a card-carrying carnivore and Midwesterner, loved it even more. Even the waiter at the fancy restaurant loved it.

And from that point forward, a partnership was struck to turn this bacon-flavored dream into a reality. In early 2007, we and a few of our close friends tasted the first three flavors of Bacon Salt, Original Smokey, Hickory and (ick) Maple on Porterhouse steaks, mashed potatoes, eggs, corn and tomato soup – literally everything Dave could find to eat in his house. One enthusiastic person even tried bacon-flavored ice cream, which we don’t really advise doing, but to each his own. With the one exception of Maple (RIP), everything was absolutely delicious – we were all just licking our plates.

Even more improbably, Dave’s 3 year old son Dean provided our first round of financing with this $5,000 win on America’s Funniest Home Videos:

 And now we bring our invention to fellow bacon lovers everywhere. Several months ago, we launched our flagship products, Original, Hickory, and Peppered Bacon Salt. There will be more variations to come, we promise, but we think you’ll really love what we’ve started with on a variety of everyday food items. Whether you’re a regular griller or a gourmet chef, are counting calories or are a vegetarian who craves mouth-watering bacon taste without the bacon guilt, this is what you’ve been waiting for.

We hope you love it like we do. Please drop us a line to tell us what you think, share your own recipes for Bacon Salt, or buy some of our bacon-themed merchandise to help spread the word while donating to a great cause.

Enjoy the bacon,

Justin and Dave, Bacontrepreneurs

passthebacon@baconsalt.com
www.baconsaltblog.com

UPDATE: Well, since I first posted this I have spoken with Dave and he sent me some bacon salt and baconnaise to play with.  This stuff seriously rocks.  I have gone to seasoning things with it at the cafe and my customers are blown away.  I have served a baconless BLT, asparagus with Cheddar flavored bacon salt and I am even using it on our grilled chicken.

February 19, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food News | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Is There a Link Between the Perception of Taste and One’s Job and Hobbies?

Derval Research Discovers a Link between the Perception of Taste and One’s Job and Hobbies.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands (MMD Newswire) February 17, 2009 – - Global Market Research firm DervalResearch, today announced that they have discovered a link between the perception of taste and an individual’s job and hobbies. Scientific research conducted between November 2008 and January 2009 on 500 people from over 25 countries offers endless opportunities in the field of marketing, new product development and commercialization.

“Our perception, skills and physical traits are greatly determined by our hormones while we are still a fetus. Based on this Hormonal Fingerprint, we can predict an individual’s preferred food, beverage, color and shapes as well as his perfect matching job, hobby or even partner,” explains Prof. Diana Derval, President and Research Director.

Prof. Derval continues, “For example, we have discovered that nurses and rugby men are more likely to be non-tasters – that means they host fewer taste buds on their tongue and can therefore eat or drink almost anything including bitter, spicy and very sweet food. On the other hand, entrepreneurs and ballerinas are super-tasters and more picky with food.”

Vidya Sagar Gannamani, Category Leader, Beverage Appliances at Philips, shares: “We discovered and experienced with Prof. Diana Derval the Hormonal Fingerprint. This remarkable biological fact explains why our perception of taste is at the same time unique and predictable.”

The Hormonal Fingerprint is explained in a video produced in partnership with COPUS 2009 Year of Science (Coalition for the Public Understanding of Science) and NEMO Science Center. The video and more information about the agenda is available at www.derval-research.com.

About DervalResearch DervalResearch, with a strong focus on new product development and commercialization, is the global market research firm for innovative and fast-moving companies. Founded in 2006, the firm identifies and turns the latest neuroscientific breakthroughs into powerful marketing frameworks like Wait Marketing (see http://www.wait-marketing.com) and the Hormonal Fingerprint (see www.hormonal-fingerprint.com). Fortune 500 firms like Philips, Sara Lee and Danone use DervalResearch expertise in cognitive marketing to design product and innovation roadmaps, perform persona and positioning analysis, conduct opportunity studies and inspire corporate seminars.

February 19, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food News | , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

JAG’s New Gig!

Originally posted at Edible TV on February 17, 2009.

Those of us who have watched Next Food Network Star the past few years have long lamented the disappointing finale of season 3.  JAG (Joshua Adam Garcia) was sure to be a run away star, much in the mold of Guy Fieri who won season 2.  Well, that didn’t happen but all who watched NFNS 3 knew that JAG was far to talented to not be a cheflebrity.

Food Network’s loss is Tampa’s gain as JAG is heading up the kitchen at POSH 27, an exciting new restaurant and night club opening later this year in the Cigar City.  Chef JAG was kind enough to give Edible TV a few minutes of his time via e-mail and here’s what he had to say:

ET: The menu at Posh 27 appears to take flavors from all over Latin America and the Caribbean.  Was this planned or did it just evolve?

JAG: This was definitely planned out to showcase a hot new culinary style all on its own. My Latino Fusionè will be tasted in every culinary aspect of Posh 27.

ET: What dishes on the menu are you most proud of?  Which ones most accurately proclaim, “This is JAG?”

JAG: It would be unfair to the other dishes to proclaim “This is JAG” or that is not JAG enough! LOL…  I stand behind every crumb laden morsel and can not decide or discriminate towards which dish best represents myself or my cuisine.  The whole damn menu is all JAG’ed up!

ET: What is the scope of your influence over the operations of Posh 27?

JAG: I am currently the Corporate Executive chef and culinary mind of Posh 27’s restaurant concept.

ET: One of the stated goals of Posh 27 is to seamlessly transition from restaurant to nightlife.  What exactly does this mean?  How is this accomplished?

JAG: That is our little secret…  All I will say is that the changing of the lighting and ambiance alone will reveal an atmosphere specifically designed to tantalize your senses.

ET: JAG, you remain one of the most popular contestants in the history of Next Food Network Star.  How has that popularity translated into your post NFNS career?

JAG: Well…  Lord knows I don’t see myself as Mr. Popularity but God has definitely blessed me with a loyal post Food Network following and the much deserved opportunity to showcase my cuisine; for that alone I am humbled and truly grateful.

ET: With a name like Posh 27 and a celebrity chef manning the kitchen is it safe to say that the restaurant will be a “place to see and be seen?”

I would say so… You be the judge… If I were you, Stuart, I’d start making some plans to be in Tampa Bay surrendering your senses to the hottest combination of Dining and Nightlife to hit the restaurant scene since Emeril went green! To answer your question…YES!  It will most definitely will be!

ET: Is there an opening date yet for Posh 27 Tampa?

JAG: Our current opening projection is scheduled for the summer of 2009.

February 18, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food on Film | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Review: Chopped

Several months ago I saw the casting call.  It read something like this, “Now casting, tri-state area chefs to compete in new Food Network cooking contest, Chopped.”  I assumed the gas prices at the time were even effecting the Food Network.  Too bad, the show sounded like fun.

Flash forward to 2009 and Chopped premieres.  It is being hosted by Ted Allen (The Food You Want to Eat, Food Detectives).  Allen is as genuine a person as I have met in this industry and certainly qualified to host a cooking competition.  His mixture of New York dry wit and a Midwesterner’s flair for the understated make for a perfect host.

Now many of my friends and contemporaries have not been complimentary of Chopped preferring Hell’s Kitchen or Top Chef.  Many have even accused Chopped of being nothing more than a cheap rip off of Bravo’s Top Chef.  I, however, prefer it to the other two shows.

My experience with both Top Chef and Hell’s Kitchen is there seems to be too much screen time devoted to people yelling or bickering and not enough dedicated to cooking.  I know that I am in the minority when I say this, but I do not like to watch people argue on TV.

I don’t like watching people scream at each other any more than I like having them scream at me.  I think such behavior is boorish and I equate those who do who enjoy watching it to the roaring crowds of the Coliseum, only without the blood thirsty part.  Again, I am in the minority on this thought process – the ratings don’t lie.

I think it is because of this lack of  ”drama” that I enjoy Chopped so much.  It gets to the essence of cooking – creativity in the kitchen.  Now for you faithful Romans there are plenty of egos and characters to route for or against each week but at it’s heart Chopped is a cooking competition not a soap opera.  And that’s fine by me.

February 16, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food on Film | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Valentine’s Eve

As Valentine’s Day is now upon me I actually look forward to it for a change.  No, not because I have a hot date.  I’m a chef in the restaurant industry that means a 14 hour shift.  No, I’m actually looking forward to Stupid Cupid Day this year because it means that Friday 13th is now mercifully over.

I’m not one to clutch old wives’ tales or to believe superstition but this Friday 13th has certainly pushed me closer to a case of triscadecaphobia.  I guess the beginning is the best place to start:

  1. The alarm went off, I sat up, reached to unplug my cell phone and as I was pulling it to me the cord hung on something jerking the phone from my hand and sending it flying into my iced tea.  I have to keep all of my calls under five seconds least they be dropped.
  2. Despite getting a head start on the day, traffic made me late for work.
  3. Upon entering my kitchen I found that one of my reach-in coolers was on the fritz – the main one of course.
  4. The kitchen timer is broken so I burned the cookies for the day.
  5. Today was busier than most because I had to balance running a shift with prepping for our Valentine’s Day dinner.  So the early delivery take-out order was not what I needed – nor on time.
  6. The FOH (Front Of House) staff forgot to tell us we were getting busy so we went from no tickets to blown away in about 5 seconds.  I of course had three or four projects sitting in the way when this happened.
  7. We ran out of sweet potato hash browns at 12:30.  At 12:55 a server put in a ticket for two orders of sweet potato hash browns.
  8. I was scheduled to cook one of everything on the four course Valentine’s Day menu at 3:00.  This was to allow the serving staff to taste and ask questions about the special menu.  At 2:00 the restaurant repairman showed up and flopped on the floor in the middle of the kitchen to work on the aforementioned reach-in cooler for an hour.  That’s right – 300 pounds of beer gut and butt crack puddled right where I needed to stand.
  9. Fixing the cooler cost $285 – half our lunch sales for the day.
  10. While creaming butter I dropped the entire electric mixer in a garbage can.
  11. My Alfredo sauce broke because the repairman had me blocked from the stove and it had to be thrown out.
  12. We ran out of sauerkraut on a day when Ruben’s were the most popular item and had to go to Dollar General to get more.  Dollar General.
  13. Afterwork my sous chef and I stopped by a local Italian restaurant that we had both been wanting to try for some time.  It sucked . . . hard.  At least I have a new review for the Azalea City Food Blog.

So, Happy Valentine’s Day.  Good riddens, Friday the Thirteenth.

February 14, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | stuart donald, wannabe tv chef | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Review: Megan Hearts Baking

Originally posted at Paper Palate on February 6, 2009.

It seemed like a nice idea for a story. As soon as I received my copy of Megan Hearts Baking by Katherine Fore and Kimberly Fate I would run across town and read it to my six-year-old niece. You see the Megan Hearts series of books is dedicated to getting young girls to try new things and develop hobbies. See, that would make for a lovely read – a forty-something chef shares his love for the culinary arts with his precious niece aided by a brilliant children’s book.

The problem? Apparently my niece already has plenty of hobbies. Who knew a six-year-old could be so busy? Seriously, it is easier to get an interview with a celebrity chef, “Maybe she can give you 15 minutes after soccer on Saturday?” I live in Alabama; I had to Google the word soccer.

In the meantime, I did get a chance to read Megan Hearts Baking and it is a genuine delight. The plot is simple, little Megan gets an invitation to her friend Ashleigh’s birthday party and is asked to bring her favorite homemade dessert to share. Unfortunately for Megan she had tried her hand at baking before with less than edible results. Determined to make her friend happy Megan again tackles baking with the help of her mother.

Megan’s mother makes sure her daughter is prepared this time around. She teaches her about measurement equivalents and shows her how to plan a shopping list. She instructs her how to make a schedule to insure that everything is done at the right time and most importantly how to prepare a recipe. And what recipe do they prepare? Aunt Laurie’s Red Velvet Cake of course.

Fore and Fate’s prose is age-perfect and greatly enhanced by the illustrations of Ying Xie. In addition to the charming narrative there are also examples of women who have turned a love a baking into successful businesses as well as a handful of other scrumptious recipes. Meagan Hearts Baking is a wonderful way to introduce a young one to the joys of the kitchen, if they can pencil you in, that is.

February 9, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | From My Other Blogs | , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Peanut Recall Reaches Kashi

Kashi recalls several products containing peanuts

Union-Tribune Staff Writer

11:36 a.m. February 3, 2009

— Kashi, the grain food company based in La Jolla, is recalling several items as part of a recently issued peanut recall, the company said in a statement on its Web site.

The company’s voluntary action comes after the Peanut Corporation of America issued a recall for all peanut ingredients produced in its Blakely, Ga., facility since Jan. 1, 2007, the Web site stated.

Kashi’s recall includes the Chewy Granola Bars in Trail Mix and Honey Almond Flax varieties dated for use before Sept. 19; Chewy Granola Bars Peanut Peanut Butter dated for use before Aug. 8; and Chewy Cookies in Oatmeal Dark Chocolate, Happy Trail Mix and Oatmeal Raisin Flax varieties dated for use before July 30.

No illnesses have been reported in connection with these products, according to the grain company, and no other Kashi products are involved in the recall.

Customers who have purchased these products should throw them away, the company said. Those who have questions or want a refund are asked to call the Kashi Consumer Response Center at (877) 701-5868.

February 3, 2009 Posted by wannabetvchef | Food News | , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet